A candy enthusiast is concerned that the manufacturer of her favorite candy is not including as much candy is advertised on the packaging. The manufacturer claims that there is a pound of candies in each bag (16 oz). The enthusiast decides to buy 10 bags of candy and will take their average weight. If the average weight is less than 15 oz, she will decide that the manufacturer is guilty of false advertising.
What is the question?
In plain language, establish an appropriate null hypothesis for this situation. What should be the associated alternative hypothesis?
<aside> <img src="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" alt="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" width="40px" />
Establish mathematical notation
Parameter of interest: $p$, the true proportion of eventual voters who support Candidate A.
Let $\hat{p}$ represent the proportion of individuals in the survey who say they support Candidate A.
Let $n$ represent the number of individuals who participate in the survey.
Let $X$ represent the number of individuals in the survey who say they support Candidate A.
Question: Articulate this investigation as a hypothesis test assuming that the null hypothesis ca be stated as “The candidates are currently tied.”
<aside> <img src="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" alt="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" width="40px" />
Hypothesis Test
Question: Suppose that 500 individuals are surveyed and 225 say they support Candidate A. Determine the values $n$, $X$, and $\hat{p}$ and choose the appropriate conclusion.
<aside> <img src="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" alt="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" width="40px" />
Multiple Choice
Solution: $n = 500$ and $X = 225$, so $\hat{p} = 0.45.$ This experimental outcome meets the rejection criterion, so we can reject the null hypothesis that the candidates are tied. Since $0.45 < 0.5$, we conclude that Candidate B is winning, so the best choice is (b).