Suppose there is an election involving two individuals: Candidate A and Candidate B. Candidate A hires a polling firm to assess how things are going. The candidate’s team decides that if either candidate has more than 52% support in the survey, then they will assess that the candidate has a substantial lead in the race.
What is the question?
In plain language, establish an appropriate null hypothesis for this situation. What should be the associated alternative hypothesis?
<aside> <img src="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" alt="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" width="40px" />
Establish mathematical notation
Parameter of interest: $p$, the true proportion of eventual voters who support Candidate A.
Let $\hat{p}$ represent the proportion of individuals in the survey who say they support Candidate A.
Let $n$ represent the number of individuals who participate in the survey.
Let $X$ represent the number of individuals in the survey who say they support Candidate A.
Question: Articulate this investigation as a hypothesis test assuming that the null hypothesis ca be stated as “The candidates are currently tied.”
<aside> <img src="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" alt="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" width="40px" />
Hypothesis Test
Question: Suppose that 500 individuals are surveyed and 225 say they support Candidate A. Determine the values $n$, $X$, and $\hat{p}$ and choose the appropriate conclusion.
<aside> <img src="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" alt="/icons/fleur-de-lis_purple.svg" width="40px" />
Multiple Choice
Solution: $n = 500$ and $X = 225$, so $\hat{p} = 0.45.$ This experimental outcome meets the rejection criterion, so we can reject the null hypothesis that the candidates are tied. Since $0.45 < 0.5$, we conclude that Candidate B is winning, so the best choice is (b).